Images: film as part of the Pompidou's permanent collection display. Left to right top to bottom, Constantine Brancusi and Laszlo Moholy-Nagy, Dziga Verton, Marchel Duchamp and Nicholas Schoffer
Tuesday, June 30, 2015
Time to get moving
Images: film as part of the Pompidou's permanent collection display. Left to right top to bottom, Constantine Brancusi and Laszlo Moholy-Nagy, Dziga Verton, Marchel Duchamp and Nicholas Schoffer
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: city gallery, curators, exhibition, film, te uru
Monday, June 29, 2015
To be perfectly Frank
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: architecture, gehry, private collector
Saturday, June 27, 2015
Friday, June 26, 2015
If you snooze, you lose
We’d like to say we went back to look at the early work at the end of our two hour visit but, between us, we didn’t.
Images: left entering room 11 and right Team V’s private audience with Pope Innocent X
Posted by jim and Mary at 6:36 AM
Labels: advice to art museum visitors
Thursday, June 25, 2015
Distance looks our way
Len Lye is in the building too and Peter Robinson’s interactive felt scatter piece has just closed. Then, still hanging in the sky above the square outside Piano & Rogers iconic building, is the ghost of Neil Dawson’s Globe the star of the 1989 Pompidou exhibition Magiciens de la terre
All this NZ-in-Paris action comes just weeks after seeing Simon Denny knock them dead in Venice. You’d have to lay a lot of this level of exposure on Creative NZ’s simple focus on success in its international funding. The fact is those Art fairs, exchange programmes, residencies, support for exhibiting off shore and bringing interested curators, writers and bureaucrats to NZ are all starting to make a real impact.
Image: in the foreground Oscar Enberg's work in the exhibition Air de jeu
Wednesday, June 24, 2015
Mannequins for dummies
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: artist studio, exhibitions
Tuesday, June 23, 2015
Putin it to them with Vladimir
If you think Auckland has a burr under its saddle about the Parekowhai Lighthouse, get yourself over to Moscow. Its citizens are facing the installation of a giant realist sculpture of Vladimir the Great (Russia’s patron saint) that stands at 25 plus meters (more than double the Parekowhai effort). And if you think the Parekowhai process is fraught, you can forget that too. We’re talking serious politics here. The St Vladimir sculpture is being used as a big up-you to the Ukraine. The thing is Vladimir’s power center was Kiev (now in present day Ukraine) and Moscow’s attempt to take over their much most loved Saint has not been lost on Ukrainians. Meanwhile, back in Moscow, the super sculpture is to be sited on Sparrow Hills making it visible from across the city and (what a surprise) it will be 16 meters taller than Kiev’s statue of Vladimir. More here in the NYT.
Images: top left, a model of the proposed statue by Salavat Scherbakov and right in progress. Bottom the Kiev version.
Posted by jim and Mary at 4:20 AM
Monday, June 22, 2015
Hide and seek
So on 13 September 2013 that’s what we did. After six months of silence we emailed the Office of the Ombudsman on 16 March 2014 to see if there had been progress. There hadn’t. Six months later again, on 15 October 2014, the Office of the Ombudsman emailed us. Our request was now with a new officer who would be ‘assisting in the investigation’ and who would ‘keep us up to date with progress’. Four months later, we are now at the begininging of February 2015, the Office of the Ombudsman wrote to say that our request was ‘still under consideration’.
Finally, two months later on 24 March (19 months after our original request), the Ombudsman sent us her report. It turns out that Creative NZ asks anyone who it deals with it to sign confidentiality agreements and the Ombudsman felt these agreements took priority over public access to information. Now you know. The Ombudsman asked us to comment before the final report was signed off which we did, arguing that using confidentiality agreements as a gagging device was not in the spirit of open government. This response still waits somewhere in the Ombudsman’s long, dark cave.
So there you go. By tactically using confidentiality agreements Creative NZ can block attempts by taxpayers to examine or assess its selection process, a process that involves the expenditure of $700,000 of public funds. And remember all that was requested was names not the discussion or deliberations that went toward the decision.
So should we just trust Creative NZ and its current processes to give us a fair result? Well no, not if the selection of Judy Millar/Francis Upritchard (additional representative added after the panel had made its decision) and Michael Parekowhai (no selection panel) are anything to go by. And is it reasonable to believe that the Official Information Act is designed to 'promote access to information held by various Government agencies'? No, it really isn’t.
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: CNZ, venice biennale creative new zealand
Saturday, June 20, 2015
The art thing
Emma Jameson describing an exhibition of Rembrandt reproductions in EyeContact
“If that’s not a fake it’s a damn clever original.”
Groucho Marx
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: fake, lookalike, photography
Friday, June 19, 2015
Another brick in the wall
Posted by jim and Mary at 9:22 AM
Labels: architecture, OTN ARCHITECTURE
Thursday, June 18, 2015
Just saying
“an unparalleled collection”
“this magnificent acquisition”
“representing high points in the artist’s achievement”
“the most comprehensive representation of his oeuvre held together in any single collection”
“important masterpieces have been added”
“especially strong in late masterpieces”
The James Wallace Trust pumps up its collection of works by Tosswill Woollaston in a recent 500-word PR release.
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: advertising, coll, collectors, promises, woollaston
Wednesday, June 17, 2015
One day in the surf board development office
Director 2: I have, it’s a global phenomenon.
D 1: And Bruegel, what’s it about Bruegel that so particularly interests the surfing set?
D2: I suspect it’s the way that he set out to create a kaleidoscope of genres so focused on communicating his intentions to his implied viewers.
D1: Could be, could be.
D2: Why do you ask?
D1: I thought we could do a Bruegel Board
And they did. (It was Hieronymus Bosch, but what the hell did they know?)
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: Art is where you find it, one day in
Tuesday, June 16, 2015
What webs they weave
Image: the K-Road site back in the days when you could bank on it being....a....bank.
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: auction, dealer gallery, dealers
Monday, June 15, 2015
Smoke and mirrors
And so the headline ‘Calls for city council to rethink Parekowhai sculpture’. But it turns out it was not 'calls' so much as a couple of private conversations, an ex Mayor chatting to some old mates on council. Even she admitted that she'd only 'raised these concerns behind the scenes …' and, backing down somewhat, was 'simply passing on comments that had been made…' Turns out that she’s not even opposed to the sculpture personally ('I think it's quite jolly'), just to where it's to be sited ('It’s such a huge big thing').
Then the Waikato Times promises 'A stoush is brewing among the city arty types' but again they're just blowing smoke. A stoush, for all of you who love dictionary definitions, is a fight or a brawl. So you have to ask, as the Parekowhai sculpture has passed through all the Council processes, who is the Waikato Times suggesting is going to line up on the other side of their ‘stoush’? Of course the ex Mayor also has some skin in the where-do-you-put-public-sculptures game. She's a member of a group that has just commissioned its own public sculpture a large (one-and-half times life size and sit on a two-metre high base) realist bronze statue of a war artist. And what-do-you-know, it’s real close to where the larger, brighter, more commanding Parekowhai will be located.
So please, could you all move away, there’s nothing to see here, just 300 words trying to rekindle a fight probably in the faint hope it might give the Waikato Times a real story to report.
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: controversy, media, parekowhai, public sculpture
Saturday, June 13, 2015
Friday, June 12, 2015
Out for a duck
Images: top, one of Hofman’s ducks. Middle, a Chinese version and bottom, the Philly duck
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: copycat, fake, giant, public sculpture
Thursday, June 11, 2015
Follow the yellow brick road
The TV guy reckons:
They are facing an increasingly segmented audience:
"We're doing more with less than at any other time.” “
And they're distracted too:
"Attention spans are so short, the instant you are not entertaining them, they are gone.”
Along with increased demands:
“In an era of declining budgets, but increasing opportunity, you've just got to do everything.”
Then, the numbers game has shifted:
“If you make a show for a certain audience, you want to make sure you get that audience."
Meaning it's no longer good enough:
"to just pull in as many viewers as possible"
Which leaves a big challenge:
"With niche audiences on the rise and budgets per show sinking, the challenge becomes how to create high-quality content without always having the benefit of a bottomless checkbook."
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: art museum, audience, exhibitions, numbers
Wednesday, June 10, 2015
Zombie sculpture
Tuesday, June 09, 2015
Could you pass me the outsource please
Monday, June 08, 2015
Golden rule
It was in the mid-nineteenth century that German psychologist Adolf Zeising kicked off the PR blitz that put the golden rectangle as the number one shape. He claimed (rather off the top of his head) that the golden rectangle was part of a 'universal law in which is contained the ground-principle of all formative striving for beauty and completeness in the realms of both nature and art, and which permeates, as a paramount spiritual ideal, all structures, forms and proportions, whether cosmic or individual, organic or inorganic, acoustic or optical; which finds its fullest realization, however, in the human form.' Who’s going to argue with that? Just Fast Company so far. But, not only does it debunk the 'ancient' origins of the Golden Sector’s mythic status, it's rounded up a professor or two who claim that people don’t even find the golden sector particularly more beautiful than other shapes that closely resemble it. Some guys at Berkeley found that, on average, consumers prefer rectangles that are in the range of 1.414 and 1.732 which contains the golden rectangle but the actual golden measurement wasn’t a clear favourite.
So maybe not such a big deal for Apple after all who is pretty relaxed about his proportions after the first decimal point. And he does use use the Fibonacci ratio for more than just aesthetics in things like his coffee bean proportions etc. Anyway, you can read the FC article here.
Images: top, Fibonacci does Fibonacci and bottom Apple does Fibonacci
Saturday, June 06, 2015
The do ron ron
Image: Ronald Reagan posing for a sculpture class at the University of Southern California in May 1940. He was invited as as ‘an example of ideal male physique.’
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: art school
Friday, June 05, 2015
Thursday, June 04, 2015
But I’ll look gross against a yellow background
“I've something I want to quickly run by the curators,” you can hear someone important growl at a Te Papa meeting. “Anyone have a problem with us encouraging people to stand with their backs to the art and take a pic of themselves with it as a background? Sensitivity towards the artist issues? Safety concerns? Copyright? No? Brilliant.”
Image: Gretchen Albrecht’s 2011 painting In a shower of gold gets the selfie treatment. (thanks Z)
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: curation (not), photo op, Te papa
Wednesday, June 03, 2015
Now we've built it will you come?
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: architecture, photography
Tuesday, June 02, 2015
Te Papa Denny purchase on the cards?
The word floating around at Venice was that the entire work had been sold in two parts so we can probably assume that one of them is going to Wellington. Looking at Denny's Secret Power as installed at the Marciana Library, Te Papa will clearly need to do more than pick and choose from the many elements if it is to coherently present the central issues raised by Denny. In essence there are three major components: the entrance way featuring an automatic sliding door and display cases that position New Zealand and the four other members of the Five Eyes spy network. Then there is a set of computer server 'vitrines' devoted to the NSA, primed by material from the Snowden releases. The third element is a further set of computer server 'vitrines' examining the work of David Darchicourt, a past designer for the NSA. By picking up the entrance section and making a carefully curated selection from the other two parallel themes, Te Papa should be able to represent Secret Power impressively. In fact, by adding in elements of the installation at Marco Polo airport, Te Papa could complete the package and allude to the Marciana library as well.
Images: Top Simon Denny entering the 'airlock' that opens the exhibition Secret Power. Bottom the two other main elements, left featuring the NSA and Snowden material and right designer David Darchicourt
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: collecting, curators, denny, Te papa, venice biennale
Monday, June 01, 2015
By the numbers
3 the amount in millions of dollars per year that Te Papa gets from the Government for ‘collection development’
6 the number of Billy Apple reviews in EyeContact since his survey exhibition opened at the Auckland Art Gallery
10 the number in thousands of visitors who attended the last Auckland Art Fair
12.5 the percentage of male exhibition attendants at the Simon Denny Venice Biennale exhibition
58 the percentage of women selected as finalists for the Waikato National Contemporary Art Award by Aaron Kreisler, Head of the Ilam School of Fine Arts in Christchurch
70 the percentage of Creative NZ funding that comes from money New Zealander's lose gambling
77.5 the amount in thousands of dollars that the Govett-Brewster paid Saatchi & Saatchi to deliver its new brand
143 the number in thousands of visitors to the exhibition Gottfried Lindauer. The Māori portraits at the Alte Nationalgalerie in Berlin this year
700 the value in thousands of dollars of the sales and commissions disputed in the Bambury / Jensen court case
1585 the number of exhibitions held at the Auckland Art Gallery since it opened on 23 June, 1927
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: apple, auckland art fair, auckland art gallery, by the numbers, CNZ, critics, Minister Culture & Heritage, venice biennale