Thursday, July 31, 2014
Crate news
So this week we've been eating mental humble pie since we saw that Pavilion (a riff on a giant up-turned milk crate) by Hany Armanious along with work by Tracy Emin and Junya Ishigami had been given the go-ahead for installation in central Sydney. There has been a predicable grumbling, some funny memes and another artist who has problems with the work. You can see what else was in Hany’s studio at the time we visited here on OTNSTUDIO
Images: top, an early maquette for Pavilion in Hany Armanious's studio in October last year and bottom a visualisation of the finished work
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: city gallery, controversy, OTN STUDIO, public sculpture
Wednesday, July 30, 2014
Just the fax
The LeWitt film demonstrated that for all his taciturn approach in public, he was an exceptionally generous man. One of his assistants John Hogan said, “if you had a fax machine and a wall you could have a work by Sol LeWitt”. As we’ve posted before, Sue Crockford had a fax machine and a wall and she also had a Sol LeWitt exhibition. LeWitt showed his famed generosity and sent all the assistants who installed the work a small drawing for their trouble. Remarkably, given the ease with which LeWitt's wall works could be presented internationally and its impact, no NZ public art museum ever took advantage of the Sol LeWitt’s fax and install process. As a footnote, one of Lewitt’s more sculptural works Pyramid is part of the Gibbs collection and is installed on The Farm
Image: Assistants installing a Sol LeWitt work in the eponymous film
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: art in the movies, et al., hotere, installation
Tuesday, July 29, 2014
Ce n'est pas un crapaud
Posted by jim and Mary at 12:00 PM
Labels: controversy, public sculpture
Why is the Fletcher Trust Collection off-loading?
And there's something else. Given that Fletchers aren’t exactly broke and that they're citizens of Auckland it’s hard to understand why these works haven’t simply been gifted to the Auckland Art Gallery. After all, the framing of the collection has always been in terms of its value to New Zealanders and the public interest. “The Fletcher Trust’s intention is that these paintings that constitute a unique record of the whole history of New Zealand art should be seen by as many New Zealanders as possible.”
So who's being culled? It’s hard to say at the level of specific paintings but a few names have been mentioned. Gretchen Albrecht is one. She has eight works in the FT collection including a classic 1985 Hemisphere and the beautiful Snake Charmer from 1976 but there's also a work on paper in the same territory as a large painting so selling it might be understandable in a tough curatorial purge. Ralph Hotere is also mentioned but deciding what to bump is not so easy. He has just six works in the collection and each has been carefully selected from an important period including a very interesting early Sangro painting. Then there's Michael Smither. OK one of the five paintings included (Red Chair from 1979) might get the nod if selling were critical but the other four are outstanding. As for Milan Mrkusich, picking even one of the nine in the collection as not worth keeping would be very hard to justify. The challenge with sales of course is that usually it's the best works that get the best prices. It would be counter-intuitive to venture into the sales arena with works that that won't get great prices unless you are simply housekeeping. And that would be insulting for the artists.
Finally there's the Alfred Sharpe question. With only four in the FT collection it’s hard to see why any of them would have to go and the idea of gifting back to the nation comes up again. For instance, the national collection held by Te Papa has just four examples of Alfred Sharpe’s work in its entire collection. That's a huge historical gap that could be brilliantly filled by Fletchers.
And so it goes. You can name search the Fletcher collection here and have a go at picking the limping impalas in the herd.
Image: Billy Apple’s painting From the Fletcher Challenge Art Collection in the Fletcher Trust Collection the Fletcher
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: auckland art gallery, auction, collectors, philanthropy, Walters Prize
Monday, July 28, 2014
From the stream
Posted by jim and Mary at 11:59 AM
Labels: art in the workplace, controversy, twitter
Hire pool
So you’ve done your 10,000 hours as a senior manager in finance or run a department in the public sector or headed up one of the polytech-universities, and it's time to step up. Fortunately applying for the Te Papa CE job is very straight forward. Go to the Te Papa site and you are told to contact John Peebles Associates, head hunters based in Remuera. Now that would be fine but the Peebles website isn’t working. In fact it expired a week ago and you've got to assume that either no one has even noticed or the cheque got lost in the mail. What’s an ambitious management guy to do? Give up while you’re ahead might be a good idea.
Experience shows that Te Papa has never been much good at the job thing. Three and a half years after Heather Galbraith left the building Te Papa still hasn't managed to hire a senior art curator. Who knows whether this is because of a lack of priority, an attempt to save money or no one wants the job. Probably it's a mix of the three. So the news that the CE ‘could be drawn from the museum world or other sources’ will just further demoralise staff (the ones who haven’t already run out the door) and depress serious supporters.
Still thanks to its glacial speed and the help it's getting from John Peebles Associates, we're not going to have to worry about the new CE of Te Papa any time soon.
Saturday, July 26, 2014
Big blow
Images: top, the rubber duck is welcomed in China and bottom deflation in Hong Kong
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: big, public sculpture
Friday, July 25, 2014
Post studio post
Stevenson has just been exhibiting in the Berlin Biennale and the Liverpool Biennial and Denny currently has a show at Portikus in Frankfurt. This is one of Europe’s key contemporary art spaces and indeed Michael Stevenson has also shown there recently. Both artists are loosely described as post studio but as a visit to OTNSTUDIO to check out Stevenson, June 2014 and Denny, June 2014 will demonstrate, studios are still alive and well.
Images: left, Michael Stevenson and right Simon Denny in their Berlin studios, June 2014
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: artist studio, denny, OTN STUDIO, stevenson
Thursday, July 24, 2014
Ping
Images: Clockwise from the left Chris, Michael and Karl with their trophies
Court out
Top in the embarrassment stakes is the revelation that Christie’s catalogued the Tucker painting's provenance as having been purchased by a Mr Ivan O'Sullivan from the Tolarno Gallery in Melbourne in 1969. Whoops! Tolarno wasn’t even up and running until 1978. Next is the appearance of one Peter Grant. He owned the Irascible Gallery and it turns out that the Tucker passed through his hands at some stage. Unfortunately this is the same Peter Grant who we posted on some years ago in a story about Brett Whiteley, Charles Blackman and Robert Dickerson fakes. None of this did a lot for the integrity of the provenance of Faun and parrot.
But Christie’s defence team has also had the opportunity to put the boot in. Now we’re hearing all about how McBride transferred works from her private collection into her pension fund which you are really not supposed to do. We’ll keep you posted but in the meantime you can read the most entertaining version of the story here.
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: auction, controversy, fake
Wednesday, July 23, 2014
Good to know
Presentation at the CNZ conference The Big Conversation (download report here)
Starkwhite comes to Wellington
If you visited the current suite of exhibitions at the City Gallery in Wellington you'd think you'd hit the nexus of the public museum/dealer relationship. The City Gallery's spaces are all but filled on both floors with three solo exhibitions by artists (and yes in the City Gallery tradition they're all male) who show at a single Auckland dealer gallery - Starkwhite. Then stir in some personal history. The City Gallery’s Senior curator Robert Leonard was Starkwhite director John McCormack's curator at the Govett-Brewster and the Dunedin Public Art Gallery. And what about the transparency issue? The Starkwhite connection is credited on two of the exhibitions (Martin Basher and Grant Stevens) at the City Gallery but is nowhere to be seen in the biggest exhibition where the three ground floor galleries are filled with Seung Yul Oh’s work. And this in an institution that raised eyebrows in the past over the multiple appearances and support of artists from the Sydney-based dealer Roslyn Oxley.
But as it happens it turns out the Starkwhiteathon is actually a mixture of loose programming and poor timing: the Seung Yul Oh show was developed in conjunction with the Dunedin Public Art Gallery and had no association with Starkwhite, Leonard has been a long-term supporter of Grant Stevens (he introduced the artist to Starkwhite way back) and the Martin Basher exhibition was already on the books.
So not exhibition programming's finest hour but a King-hit for Starkwhite
Image: Seung Yul Oh (detail)
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: city gallery, curators, dealer gallery, programming
Tuesday, July 22, 2014
Big bird
Images: The Norwegian blue being installed
Posted by jim and Mary at 12:00 PM
Labels: big, giant, public sculpture
Big eyes
- Plants in pots, in arrangements and in fragments
- Large mirrors and reflective surfaces
- Installations in stand-alone rooms
- Tiles and more tiles, on the floor, on the wall and on the ceiling
- Performances (many of them based on work by Yvonne Rainer)
- Collectives and groups
- Ceramics, ceramics and more ceramics
- Rumbling bass sound tracks
- Small abstract paintings that remind you of other paintings you've seen
- Artist statements printed onto the gallery wall
- Things made of bronze that look like they are made of something else
- Artists writing printed in handouts
- Artists curating other artists as their own work of art
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: advice to art museum visitors, advice to art students, advice to gallery directors, list, trends
Monday, July 21, 2014
Sitting
Posted by jim and Mary at 12:00 PM
Labels: collectors on furniture
Prize list
“The Walters Prize is the way Auckland City Gallery Toi o Tamaki deals with contemporary art. It outsources the selection of the finalists to four people from elsewhere in the New Zealand art world.”
Two of the four on the selection panel live in Auckland while a third, Tina Barton, graduated from Auckland University and was for some time a curator at the Auckland Art Gallery. Three of the four finalists went to art school in Auckland.
"There's no cover charge for the Walters Prize this year."
Admission to the Walters Prize was also free in 2012.
“The Walters selections so far have shown a bias against older artists and object makers.”
Five of the six winners of the Walters Prize (et al., Francis Upritchard, Peter Robinson, Dan Arps, Kate Newby) are object makers and Yvonne Todd is a photographer. Seventeen of the 28 finalists to date have been object makers. The average age of Walters Prize winners is 36 and 12 of the 28 finalists were over 40.
“As to the question of what contemporary art is, the answer seems to be, "It's what contemporary artists do."
This idea was first proposed by Marcel Duchamp 100 years ago in 1914.
“Worth noting is that the Walters Prize was opened by Mayor Len Brown, whose council passed a bylaw that includes a ban on "nuisance" begging. 'Uhila would have breached the bylaw when he pitched a tent alongside the gallery to shelter from the winter chill.”
As far as we know direct begging is not part of Kalisolaite 'Uhila’s work.
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: auckland art gallery, Walters Prize
Saturday, July 19, 2014
Saturday chart
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: chart, collectors
Friday, July 18, 2014
Centre of attention
Image: LACMA’s Pacific collection with Shigeyuki Kihara’s Siva in Motion centre
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: collecting, video
Signature style
The icon offering is a copy of the album Soon Over Babaluma recorded by the German band Can in 1974. We know it was owned by Clairmont because he hand printed his name on the sleeve presumably to make sure it came back if borrowed. It ended up with Clairmont’s friend the artist Allen Maddox and was in turn passed on to the Trade Me seller.
So, there you go, two associations for the price of one.
And what do you pay for a record that was once owned by Philip Clairmont and presumably touched by Allen Maddox? Bidding starts at $500. OTY.
Image: top, the associated Can album and bottom, the crucial Clairmont name on the reverse of the sleeve. (thanks for the heads up P)
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: auction, clairmont, collectables
Thursday, July 17, 2014
Quiz
Who made an art work that is -
“Monumental and extremely important”
“Highly revered”
“Irritating, strange yet very familiar”
“Profoundly important”
“A subtle political statement that urges its audience to look past the smooth veneers of the modern world”
“Approachable yet cryptic”
“An intense cocktail of vivid colours”
“About the communicative potential of the creative act”
Whose painting has -
“An idyllic eloquent tranquility”
“A strong sense of the transcendent”
“A fresh and improvisational feeling”
“A newfound understanding of the gravity and implications of the human gesture”
“An eerie yet beguiling quality”
Who created -
“A career defining masterpiece”
“A deeply enigmatic work”
Who has -
“A profound but highly personal perspective”
“Inherent spirituality”
Who is -
“One of New Zealand’s most voracious appropriators”
“Inviting the viewer to gaze upon he façade of a world driven by industrial production”
“Creating imagery in which slight of hand is incorporated into the artistic process”
Wednesday, July 16, 2014
In the cut
Images: top, Lucio Fontana Concetto spaziale, Attese. Bottom left Barnet Newman Who’s Afraid of Red, Yellow and Blue III and right Cathedra
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: controversy, painting
Tuesday, July 15, 2014
Desk bound
Posted by jim and Mary at 12:00 PM
But seriously
The strange thing was how much more real the dog seemed in these large white galleries than it had outside in nature, albeit a nature somewhat distorted by Huyghe. In part we all felt comfortable about the dog because of the relaxed attitude of the guards at the Ludwig Museum in Cologne. They had obviously been specifically briefed for this exhibition - you could sit anywhere, lean on anything, touch most things, take photos, lie down, and so on.
Was this attitude why most of the visitors were under 30? The exhibition was staged as a series of inter-related but distinct encounters and this chunking really worked. Each event (whether it was a large scale video, a set of drawings, a statue with a beehive growing on its head, an aquarium, smoke and mirrors) was an opportunity for people to lie on the floor, talk among themselves and absorb the exhibition in a way that is quite different from the long hard stare we're used to. It may have become a cliché but the phrase that best summed up the Huyghe exhibition was serious fun. Not just populist or spectacular or interactive (although it turned out to be all three) but the fun made by an intensely curious artist treated seriously. And there were no labels, just a sheet with a map, list of works and brief commentary. #justsaying
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: art museum, exhibitions, installation
Monday, July 14, 2014
Memory line
Posted by jim and Mary at 12:00 PM
Labels: installation, sculpture
Where’s Walters
Images: top, Luke Willis Thompson at the Weltkulturen Museum and lower Simon Denny at Portikus
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: Walters Prize
Saturday, July 12, 2014
Friday, July 11, 2014
Space cadets
This year the selection panel (Christina Barton, Anna-Marie White, Peter Robinson and Caterina Riva) has made an unusual selection when it comes to making an exhibition in a public art museum. You may remember that for the last Walters Prize the judges didn’t see most of the work; the current judges have found another wrinkle. This time round it’s us who won’t be able to see most of work they’ve selected in the gallery. What’s a bricks and mortar institution to do?
Given that Luke Willis Thompson’s work was founded on the idea of not showing work in his dealer gallery there’s a good chance that Maddie Leach and Kalisolaite ‘Uhila may also end up with empty gallery spaces. Ok, maybe some signage and a photo but that could be it, which would pretty much leave the AAG’s 3rd floor space with a Simon Denny exhibition. Still it’s sure to be intense, jam packed with information and visual material.
So maybe the AAG was right after all in giving so little space to temporary contemporary art exhibitions after all. If the Walters Prize is anything to go by, artists don’t want it any more.
Image: proposal concept for a blog illustration that can’t be seen
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: auckland art gallery, Walters Prize
Thursday, July 10, 2014
End game
Art-as-commodity dealer Olyvia Kwok talks about making money off the top end of the art market in the London Evening Standard
Posted by jim and Mary at 12:00 PM
Labels: art market, auction, quote
Numbers: international edition
69 the number in thousands of square feet that is the footprint of the three buildings occupied by the Museum of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles
74 the percentage of people making a living from the arts in New York who are white
75 the number of artists in New York thought to earn seven figure sums from their work
75 the number of plane and truck shipments needed to get all the work delivered to the Jeff Koons retrospective at the Whitney Museum in New York
80 the percentage of visitors who are attracted by temporary exhibitions when they visit the famously successful Tate in London
200 the figure in millions of dollars that represents the estimated value of the works in the Jeff Koons retrospective
246 the number in millions of dollars that British artist Damien Hirst was said to be worth in 2012
100 the number in thousands of square feet that will be the footprint of the dealer gallery Hauser Wirth & Schimmel when it opens in Los Angeles
1575 the estimated number of art museums in the United States
1964 the year American critic Arthur Danto coined the phrase ‘The art world’
Posted by jim and Mary at 6:43 AM
Labels: by the numbers, koons, numbers
Wednesday, July 09, 2014
Ship shape
Images: Top an original, second row patterning by Carlos Cruz-Diez and bottom how about this from Tobias Rehberger
You say studio, I say studio
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: artist studio, OTN STUDIO
Tuesday, July 08, 2014
When art walks the runway
Unlike most single artist surveys van Noten has made a large exhibition (alongside the curator Pamela Golbin) focused on his influences. These are something many artists like to keep in the cupboard for as long as they can but for van Noten, “Fashion is so rich…because we can draw on so many sources of inspiration.”
Van Noten's inspirations turn out to be very diverse but one surprising one to us turned out to be Jane Campion’s 1993 feature The piano. It got a large room to itself with clips from the movie and a range of black on black outfits that echoed its well-known aesthetic and period detail. We were also intrigued by the other 20th and 21 century artists van Noten rates as his inspirations and the value he places on them. And they are not just mentioned on a wall text but represented by significant or idiosyncratic works. Francis Bacon was included of course via four or five torn pages from magazine and paint splattered photographs taken off the famous studio floor, carefully conserved and now on permanent display in Dublin. Marcel Broodthaers was there with mussels and Christopher Wool with words and Elizabeth Peyton with a couple of dashing portraits. One painting spoke of another constellation of influences we are very familiar with. The 1966 painting Tauri by Victor Vasarely could be taken in technique and style for a complex Gordon Walters. Walters often mentioned Vasarely as important to him, but to see this one right in front of you, wow.
Image: the section given over to the influence of Jane Campion's film The piano on Dries van Noten
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: art and fashion, movies, style
Roll with it
Cloud from Richard Clarkson on Vimeo.
(Oh, ok... thanks M)
Monday, July 07, 2014
Rocking
A friend described it as the way McCahon ‘collected and processed so greedily and brilliantly with the weird peripheral details that get you’. And so you turn from walls packed with staggering moments of art history and look up at the ceiling for some visual respite and there they are - rocks in the sky. Could McCahon have seen these works? We know he never went to Paris so no, he didn't twist his neck to look at them in the extraordinary house that's now the Jacquemart André museum . As to whether he could have seen them reproduced in an old art book, probably now well hidden in the stacks, that’s a job to be sent off to PhD land. But he sure saw them in his mind and then, more remarkably, knew what to do with them.
Images: panels by Girolamo da Santa Croce on the ceiling of the Jacquemart André museum in Paris
Saturday, July 05, 2014
Seven days
Tuesday: scan pic
Wednesday: send scan to China
Thursday: receive jpg of prototype
Friday: make small adjustments
Saturday: place order
Sunday: rest
Images: left Urs Fischer Untitled (Lamp bear) right Chinese bear lamp as sold in the Centre Georges Pompidou's design store
Friday, July 04, 2014
See what?
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: architecture, marketing
Thursday, July 03, 2014
Under performing
Apparently Auckland wants to put arts and culture “in its rightful place: within us, amidst us and about us.” To get things started they’ve come up with six objectives of the 'Auckland-can-be-a-totally-cultural-city and super-interesting-to-be-in' kind. You've got it, this is another marketing plan. The killer app turns out to be Auckland's Maori, Pacific and Asian communities. And the way to the top of the lists? More festivals, more activities, more performances, more events leading to more access and even more diversity.
The existing visual arts infrastructure is spectacularly underplayed in all this more, more, more approach. OK, Auckland Art Gallery is mentioned a few times but it's mostly being lauded for its award winning building (although it has to be said not a building specifically designed to cater for Maori and Pacific cultures). Its first big Pacific Island show Home AKL held exactly two years ago this month gets a mention but there’s no suggestion of them doing it once a year or even doing it again.
The tertiary education sector is probably one of the biggest investors in the visual arts in Auckland through countless art schools but it gets no mention at all. There’s a nod to Te Papa North and how its “multi-agency approach avoids duplication and maximises the regional and national benefits for storage, provision of education and hosting of exhibitions” which doesn’t sound very sexy. Te Tuhi and the Mangere Arts Centre are mentioned once in a list called “something already happening in Auckland” and the Fresh Gallery is not mentioned at all. A Regan Gentry project is used as a case study but there's no mention of Artspace and only a passing reference to the network of dealer galleries.
So how will the visual arts contribute to Auckland's most liveable future? Not very much by the look of it. The plan is undercooked when it comes to this sector. Their main role is described a filling 'our city with art and design that tell our stories [that] give us a greater sense of civic pride and belonging." There's not going to be a long queue to play that game.
Submissions close on 24 July.
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: auckland art gallery, mangere arts centre, te tuhi
Wednesday, July 02, 2014
Last Woltz
Posted by jim and Mary at 12:00 PM
Labels: giant horse, large animal sculpture, public sculpture
Space invaders
1 Use cheap materials. Clay, paper, cardboard boxes, corrugated card and iron, tires and bricks.
2 Cover the floor with a cheap material. That clay comes in handy again and so does paint or, if you’re really low on funds, water (in sheets or puddles).
3 Install a very small work into a very large space.
4 Construct a set and decorate it with theater props
5 Use video projection on free-standing screens or the back wall of a large room
6 Project video onto floors (this seems the same as item 5 but add a balustrade – more bang for the bucks)
7 Use old school tv sets to show your video and fill up the remaining space with chairs and couches
8 Cover walls with decorative surfaces (wallpaper, newsprint, graffiti)
9 Make something large and hollow using light cheap materials (painted paper, paper mache etc)
10 Place small works on plinths widely separated from one another
11 Performance
You're welcome.
Images: some example left to right top to bottom. Light weight and hollow – Eduardo Basualdo, painted floors and walls - Michael Riedel, video on floor - Tony Ousler, small ojects large space – Julien Bismuth, cheap materials on floor - Dominique Ghesquiere, plinths – Agnieszka Kurant, large found objects and theatrical devices – Hiroshi Sugimoto
Posted by jim and Mary at 6:52 AM
Labels: advice to art students, art museum, installation
Tuesday, July 01, 2014
The Count
Top people magnet is the Auckland Art Gallery helped hugely by its new building. Next up, kind of surprisingly, is the Dunedin Public Art Gallery. Its attendances must wipe everyone else off the map in visitors as a percentage of population. Then it’s Te Papa’s fifth floor. There are no audited figures available but over the years we've cobbled together an estimate based on its own reports.
Only one on the list Rotorua charges an entrance fee although some of the others do charge for temporary or touring exhibitions. Many institutions don’t publish their attendance figures or do so in a way that makes them difficult to extract. The Dowse's attendance numbers, for instance, are combined with the Petone Settlers Museum at 204,000 so aren't included (The Dowse have since told us their latest annual attendance figure is 205,563 not including the Petone Settlers Museum). There's also the notorious kid factor - the percentage of non-voluntary children (aka school kids) bulking up these figures is of course a deeply hidden secret.
But here’s a rough and ready guide.
Auckland Art Gallery 720,000
Dunedin Public Art Gallery 255,000
Te Papa’s fifth floor 190,000
City Gallery Wellington 161,681
Waikato Art Museum 111,915
Rotorua Museum 97,642
Govett Brewster 67,000
Sarjeant Gallery 37,463
Image: sophisticated chart from OTN’s design department
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: art museum, audience, numbers