Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Water world
Posted by jim and Mary at 11:51 AM
Labels: parekowhai, sculpture, venice biennale
Chimera
Monday, May 30, 2011
Into the void
Posted by jim and Mary at 11:58 AM
Labels: exhbitions, media
The light fantastic
Posted by jim and Mary at 6:56 AM
Labels: advice to collectors, collecting, lookalike
Saturday, May 28, 2011
Friday, May 27, 2011
What's in that crate?
Posted by jim and Mary at 5:30 AM
Labels: crate, parekowhai, venice biennale
Thursday, May 26, 2011
Guten tag?
It would be entertaining to see him put that upbeat view to Richard Serra who's work Berlin Junction is helping get some street art ‘directly to the public’ here in Berlin.
Another OTN post on this sculpture here
Posted by jim and Mary at 6:57 AM
Labels: art museum, public sculpture, serra
Wednesday, May 25, 2011
When art hits the headlands
Posted by jim and Mary at 6:07 AM
Labels: controversy, exhibitions, headlands
Tuesday, May 24, 2011
Lesson
German artist Neo Rauch telling the May issue of Art Newspaper why he left teaching
Nice work if you can get it
So says Alison Baverstock in her book How to get a job in a museum or art gallery. Baverstock has eight key points she reckons makes the job a must-have including, “The chance to meet interesting people. Working in a pleasant place and having a job that people find fascinating.” Nice work if you can get it but given the vast numbers of students passing through the fine arts courses the chance to have people believe you amble around a gallery all day and be paid for it is going to be subject of increasingly tough competition.
Posted by jim and Mary at 5:05 AM
Labels: art museum, publishing
Monday, May 23, 2011
Clever as
Hard to understand how a ‘Creative Capital’ could put its best creative foot forward, and only manage a copycat. In the end we're talking about a small idea for a big sign that has already been used by provincial towns all over the world. It's also probably the moment to remember that the Hollywood sign was originally an advertisement for a housing development - Hollywood Land.
Posted by jim and Mary at 5:10 AM
Labels: controversy, copy cat, public sculpture
Saturday, May 21, 2011
The iron fist in the bloody glove
Posted by jim and Mary at 5:24 AM
Labels: art in adland
Friday, May 20, 2011
Stuffed
Posted by jim and Mary at 11:57 AM
Labels: channeling
Action
Posted by jim and Mary at 5:23 AM
Labels: performance
Thursday, May 19, 2011
In Berlin
Posted by jim and Mary at 11:59 AM
Labels: duchamp, thinking about
Leads and chorus to the stage please
Image: Preparing canvases for the Ten Big Paintings exhibition (contemporary recreation)
Posted by jim and Mary at 6:51 AM
Labels: auckland art gallery, exhibitions
Wednesday, May 18, 2011
Statue of limitations
Posted by jim and Mary at 5:28 AM
Labels: art in the movies
Tuesday, May 17, 2011
In the dark
CNZ Venice Blog
Posted by jim and Mary at 11:51 AM
Labels: cnz venice, quote
Wall street
It's not such a random assumption as Serra's work can be seen in a number of places in the city. There's Berlin Block for Charlie Chaplin and Berlin Junction and he was also closely involved (although withdrew before the project was completed) with architect Peter Eisenman on the famous arrangement of concrete blocks that make up the Memorial to the Murdered Jews in Europe down by the Brandenburg Gate.
And, even if Serra was not have involved in this latest memorial, it certainly stands as a testament to how powerful his sculptural ideas have become as markers of scale and moment.
Posted by jim and Mary at 5:07 AM
Labels: public sculpture, serra
Monday, May 16, 2011
Keeping it real
Gaillard’s beer mountain was presented as an investigation into how 'preserving a monument goes hand in hand with destroying it' but, given the climbing, drinking and danger that ensued, we’re figuring the subtext had to be Jackass.
Posted by jim and Mary at 6:59 AM
Labels: installation
Saturday, May 14, 2011
When good bronze turns bad
Posted by jim and Mary at 6:53 AM
Labels: public sculpture, smut
Friday, May 13, 2011
Listing to the right
- Deborah McCormick, Director SCAPE
- Steph Walker, General Manager, Christchurch Arts Festival
- Dr. Jane Gregg, Dean of Creative Industries
- Dr. George Parker, Manager Te Puna Toi Performance Research Project
- Philip Aldridge, Chief Executive, The Court Theatre
- James Caygill, CEO, Christchurch Symphony Orchestra and Southern Opera
- Sean Whitaker, General Manager, Christchurch School of Music
Did no one think that some artists might have a contribution to make? Are there no artists in Christchurch who would be prepared to be on such a group? Impossible to believe.
In other circumstances CNZ is obsessed by representation as a founding principle - the upcoming legislation for the new Arts Council for example stipulates 46% of its members are selected from specific racial groupings - so you have to wonder why artists aren't seen as a crucial element of the Christchurch arts community.
Image: before you ask we are assuming the boat is bow towards us
Posted by jim and Mary at 1:09 AM
Labels: Christchurch, Christchurch quake, CNZ
Thursday, May 12, 2011
Crowded house
Posted by jim and Mary at 11:55 AM
Labels: art museum, audience
Going for the doctor
The speaker was the current President of Lincoln University in Philadelphia and he was talking about the unique exhibiting style, restricted access and dysfunctional relationship with professional art museums of the Barnes Collection courtesy of its founder Dr Albert C Barnes. You can catch up with the full story of the Barnes Collection and its battle with the City of Philadelphia efforts to relocate it into a new space in the city centre here, or catch the excellent albeit Barnes-eyed documentary The art of the steal.
Barnes believed that once collectors have their mitts on great art they can do with it whatever they please. It pleased Dr Barnes to inform it with his eccentric views on education and hatred of the Philadelphia Art Museum. He also attempted to have his vision continue to direct the collection beyond the grave courtesy of an intricately fashioned will.
Not that Barnes stands alone in this take-it-or-leave attitude. At one seminar we attended a collector told participants that she had always kept one of her works by Colin McCahon in the back of a cupboard, and that it was no one’s business but her own. Further more, she added, she was entitled to reduce the work to a pile of ash it if she felt like it.
Fortunately not all collectors feel this way. Much of the work seen in public museums comes from private collections either as loans or gifts and private collectors are increasingly making their works available to the public in their own institutions. And of course many works from private collections end up as gifts to public ones. Meanwhile the marathon legal battle in Philadelphia continues as the judge overseeing the case has ordered yet another round of arguments over whether to re-open the case.
Posted by jim and Mary at 6:54 AM
Labels: controversy
Wednesday, May 11, 2011
Drinking in the atmosphere
Posted by jim and Mary at 6:50 AM
Labels: art school
Tuesday, May 10, 2011
The son also rises
Posted by jim and Mary at 11:57 AM
Labels: advice to art students
Or are you just terrified to see me?
Posted by jim and Mary at 6:58 AM
Labels: public sculpture
Monday, May 09, 2011
Power to the people
Posted by jim and Mary at 6:59 AM
Labels: public sculpture
Saturday, May 07, 2011
The Saturday competition
Friday, May 06, 2011
Spooky
Posted by jim and Mary at 6:59 AM
Labels: public sculpture
Thursday, May 05, 2011
The Gagosian gallery sees right through us
Posted by jim and Mary at 6:59 AM
Labels: dealer gallery
Wednesday, May 04, 2011
Spam
Tuesday, May 03, 2011
The vision thing
Essentially a vision statement is big picture and describes an organisation's hopes for its future, usually with a big dollop of inspiration to motivate the troops. The mission is then the roadmap to get there. From a quick scan, museums are not big on visions. If they articulate a vision (and many do not), they tend to opt for statements about doing what they're doing but in a bigger building (Tate Modern) or going short and general (MCA Sydney 'Engaging with contemporary art and ideas') or long and general (National Gallery of Australia in Canberra 'the cultural enrichment of all Australians through access to their national art gallery, the quality of the national collection, the exceptional displays, exhibitions and programs, and the professionalism of Gallery staff).
Te Papa's current vision is obese, even by NGA standards. You can see why the new CEO and Chair are taking a knife to it.
Te Papa’s current vision is to be:
• relevant to all New Zealanders through stories of our collections and scholarship, and through these engage with communities throughout New Zealand
• a source of experiences for audiences to grow their understanding and respect for mātauranga Māori, and the different cultures of New Zealand
• a means of access to the best collections from around the world
• creative, collaborative, and outward looking
• fun, challenging, and always enriching
An effective vision is supposed to show how an organisation's future will look different from its past and it needs to start with a realistic understanding of where it is now. Working that out it probably what's going to take the time. There are big questions for Te Papa to deal with. Take its incarnation as a mega-scale, very pricey children's museum (is that what we signed up for?), its inward focus (who'd know the rest of the world exists?), its ongoing struggle with art and its fundamental sustainability.
If you want to tell whether Te Papa's new Mission and Vision statements will create a positive difference, you only have to ask a couple of questions.
• Are they easy to understand and remember?
• Do they make sense to people outside the organisation?
• Are there sensible ways to find out whether they are on track?
When the new version hits the streets we’ll apply these three simple tests and see how they go.
Monday, May 02, 2011
Australia’s next top modeller
Posted by jim and Mary at 6:48 AM
Labels: architecture, lego, sculpture