Fashion designer Yohji Yamamoto
Monday, March 31, 2014
Apres copycat
Fashion designer Yohji Yamamoto
Another brick in the wall
And there was more. After peering across a long brick wall to locate a set of minute Matt Hinkley works, another brick wall came as no surprise until with a big smack in the side of the head we saw it was ripped. Now that was one of the big visual surprises of the Biennale. It turned out we were looking at a ‘brick’ wall that had been constructed and painted as part of the set for X-Men Origins: Wolverine that was filmed on Cockatoo Island in 2008.
Images: top, Interrogation by Ignas Krunglevicius. Second row searching for Matt Hinkley and bottom, the Wolverine wall.
Posted by
jim and Mary
at
7:00 AM
Labels: art in the movies, biennale, media
Saturday, March 29, 2014
Not Bacon
Here are photos of a couple of painting pigs sent to us by a reader (thanks D) who claims they come out of ‘intensive research’ but are more likely culled from Google Images via the code words ‘painting pig’. We also had a painting parrot on offer but it was obvious even on a cursory glance that a hand puppet was involved. There are rules around human intervention. You can find OTN’s creative animal protocols here. And as you probably guessed, the pigs (both of them coincidentally) are known as Pigasso. Clever.
Posted by
jim and Mary
at
7:00 AM
Labels: animal art
Friday, March 28, 2014
The black box Biennale
And in mega exhibitions like the Sydney Biennale, the curatorial framing through labels matters hugely. Faced with artists most of us have never heard of, the labels are essential to help figure out what we’re looking at and why. In this case we were poorly served by grand claims and abstractions.
Poor old Douglas Gordon’s 2011 piece Phantom (a grand piano and slow-mo film of an eye) was touted as “a room brought to the brink of emotion” It wasn’t. When we were there four of the seven people with us were doing things on their phones. NZ’s sole representative Shannon Te Ao also suffered from label blight. He was well placed in the Art Gallery of NSW but the video of him reading poetry to animals was undercut rather than elucidated by the claim that it showed “the potential of the poetic to reignite our social and interspecies imagination”. Try telling that to the mellow donkey who drifted in and out of shot or, better still, the large white bird who slept through the whole thing.
One big plus for the event had to be the triumph of phones - or cameras as we call them now - especially in the Biennale’s audience-pleasing set pieces. The Jim Lambie room was a huge win for Instagram and Facebook with lots of people having a lot of fun posing and taking photos of each other. This was probably enough in itself but but no, the label was a big downer of “inward portals to the psychic world of dreams and the unconscious: an internal desire made manifest.”
Come on curator people are we talking cool fun or deep messages? If the Biennale of Sydney is anything to go by you can’t have it both ways.
Images: top, Jim Lambie gets the FaceBook treatment and bottom Shannon Te Au talks to the animals.
Posted by
jim and Mary
at
7:00 AM
Labels: biennale, label land, labels
Thursday, March 27, 2014
Bob's your uncle
Images: Left Taj Bourgeois's Monogram 2014 and right the original Monogram by Robert Rauschenberg. You can see more of Taj Bourgeois‘s work here
By the numbers: Peter McLeavey edition
1.175 the number in thousands of small canvases hung on one wall of the Peter McLeavey gallery for John Reynolds’s Looking West, late afternoon, low water
3 the price in thousands of dollars Peter McLeavey put on Colin McCahon’s Northland Panels the first time it was shown in the Gallery in 1968
4 the number of women on the current artist roster of the Peter McLeavey Gallery
10 the original weekly rental for the space on Cuba Street in pounds
10 the number of architectural features in the gallery censured by Billy Apple in 1979
21 the number of artists on the current Peter McLeavey Gallery roster
25 the number in thousands of dollars paid for the Northland panels by the National Art Gallery in 1978
45 the number of years of exhibitions held at 147 Cuba Street
68 the number of artists who have had solo exhibitions at the Peter McLeavey Gallery
74 the age of Lois White when she had her first ever solo exhibition at the McLeavey Gallery in 1977
78 Peter McLeavey's age in years
94 the number of pounds received for Peter's McLeavey’s first sale (a work by Tosswill Woollaston)
100 the number of dollars in thousands the BNZ allocated to Peter McLeavey each year to build its collection in the 1980s
147 the Cuba Street address of the Peter McLeavey Gallery
544 the number of exhibitions shown at the Peter McLeavey Gallery to date
1900 the year the building at 147 Cuba Street was constructed
All but a couple of these numbers were taken from Jill Trevelyan's excellent book Peter McLeavey: the life and times of a New Zealand art dealer. You can purchase a copy here.
Image: Peter McLeavey with a painting from Julian Dashper's exhibition in September 1989
Posted by
jim and Mary
at
7:00 AM
Labels: by the numbers, dealer gallery, dealers, McLeavey
Wednesday, March 26, 2014
This is not a catwalk
Posted by
jim and Mary
at
12:00 PM
Labels: art and fashion, channeling, style
Show biz
What we are looking at are in fact teachers from the Famous Artists School. It was started in the late forties to run correspondence courses. They were advertised on the backs of comics and still have an online presence today with the irresistible question: “so you want to be an artist?” Included in this photograph is Norman Rockwell who was on the faculty. He's the one with a bow tie standing fourth from the left.
So what prompted these eleven male artists to pose in this fashion? To publicise the 1949 movie Samson and Delilah directed by Cecil B DeMille at Paramount. Each of the artists had been commissioned to paint their vision of the story. The actress Candice Bergen recalled the Rockwell painting hanging in the Paramount commissary. It can now be found in the National Museum of American Illustration in Louisville, Kentucky.
Posted by
jim and Mary
at
7:00 AM
Labels: artists pose
Tuesday, March 25, 2014
Being picky
One thing that's certain is this jury’s desire to show it's in the curatorial moment. Check out their joint statement pointing out “art’s traction as a means to engage the social, economic, cultural, technological, and environmental realities”. You’re not going to find homages to older artists (think Bill Culbert at the Venice Biennale) in the Walters Prize selections and certainly no interest in traditional media like painting.
But you do have to wonder about the role of the overseas judge. At the start it was pretty clear; the jury sorted out who had made the major contributions based on local knowledge and the judge picked the one that was in his or her opinion the most interesting as an art work in the international context. Over the last two or three prize selections, however, the jury has muscled into what was previously the judge's territory. In a weird way, the overseas judge has ended up judging the panel's taste as much as the artists' abilities.
Suddenly which juror advocated for which artist becomes significantly more interesting.
Images: the Walters Prize Jury, from the left Anna-Marie White, Caterina Riva, Christina Barton and Peter Robinson
Posted by
jim and Mary
at
7:00 AM
Labels: auckland art gallery, Walters Prize
Monday, March 24, 2014
High, higher, highest
"No matter how high you pay for the priceless, you're always getting it cheap."
Move, move, move
Commissioning kinetic sculpture is one thing though, and looking after them is something else entirely as Wellington is discovering. Leon Van Den Eijkel Urban forest has only rarely spun on all cylinders, Phil Dadson’s Akau Tangi is often a few spinners down and even though it's up and running again after a long break, Len Lye’s Water Whirler only gives out the ghost of its intended performance.
Now one of the most successful (kinetically speaking) of Wellington's sculptures, Phil Price's Zephyrometer, has been dismantled for maintenance. Peering at the housing laid out on the ground though it looks as if the strain on the base has ripped at the sculpture’s skin. Who knows how long it will be down but the problem appears a little more serious than a quick clean and oil job.
Soon New Plymouth will have a whole museum devoted to kinetic sculpture with its Len Lye Centre. Kinetic sculpture in NZ has become a movement.
Images: top, Zephyrometer laid out for repair. Middle, damage to the housing and bottom, in case you have never seen the point of Zephyrometer, here it is.
Posted by
jim and Mary
at
9:26 AM
Labels: auckland art gallery, controversy, len lye, len lye centre, public sculpture, sculpture trust
Saturday, March 22, 2014
Totally outstanding
Who creates “Masterly executed work”?
Which artist is a “Chromatic master”?
Who was a “powerful influence on a generation of painters”?
Who had an “unbridled passion for the female form”?
Which artist created “A monumental masterpiece”
Who painted a “key work” in a “Ground-breaking exhibition”?
Which artist was described as our “Most daring and cerebral”?
Who had a “Seminal 2005 exhibition”?
Who’s painting was “A gem”?
Which artist painted with “Majestic poise”?
Who created “Unforgettable paintings”?
The artists: Judy, Millar, C F Goldie, Tony Fomison, Robin White, Lillian Budd, W D Hammond, Francis Upritchard and Garth Tapper
ANSWERS HERE
Friday, March 21, 2014
Developments
Posted by
jim and Mary
at
12:00 PM
Labels: photography













