Saturday, September 29, 2012
By the numbers: Gagosian edition
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: dealer gallery, gagosian
Friday, September 28, 2012
Photo op
Gordon Walters talking to Keith Stewart in the December 1994 issue of Quote Unquote.
Image: (JB&MB) taken in Gordon Walters’s Christchurch studio 1979
Posted by jim and Mary at 12:00 PM
Labels: artist studio, photo op, walters
Eventful
Posted by jim and Mary at 6:45 AM
Labels: auckland art gallery
Thursday, September 27, 2012
Art is where you find it
Posted by jim and Mary at 12:00 PM
Labels: Art is where you find it
When Ron and Larry got unmarried
The pending cases also demonstrate the immense power mega-artists like Koons wield over their market. Essentially Koons had a deal with Gagosian over his yet-to-be-completed $US4 million granite sculpture of Popeye that if it was on-sold at any time in the future he (Koons) would get 70 percent of anything above the original sale price. It’s the artist’s resale fee on steroids. And just in case anyone thought there would be some wriggle room, Koons also insisted on 80 percent of any resale profit should the sculpture come back into Gagosian’s hands before it was completed. That’s a seriously powerful player at work.
Welcome to the world of dealer/artist/collector relations where collectors not only purchase works from art dealers but also consign them back for resale, exchange them for other works and sell back direct. Tons of room for confusion and misunderstanding there. As one US attorney put it, “There’s a certain level of informality in the art market that is not helpful to any of the parties.”
The court papers filed by Ron Perelman (you can get them here) claim that as the already paid for Popeye sculpture was running seven months late, it was decided to add it to some other art works as part payment for yet another, grander acquisition. All the pieces went back and forward with Larry Gagosian receiving the returned Perelman’s works and Perelman getting his new painting.
Then all hell broke loose as Perelman claimed Gagosian “Fraudulantly induced [Perelman] to purchase Popeye a sculpture by Jeff Koons and forced [him] to accept an exchange rate significantly below its fair market value”. Gagosian responded in kind accusing Perelman of engaging in “a series of sham settlements and deceptive maneuvers”.
Put simply, Larry reckoned that Ron hadn’t paid for Popeye so obviously he wasn't going to get the full price back for it but Perelman found out about Jeff's 70 percent so he figured that Larry wasn’t going to offer him very much at all because he wasn’t going to make any profit so Ron decided to sue which really really upset Larry who thought Ron was a friend and anyway he hadn’t ever sued one of his clients before but what the hell you have to make a start somewhere besides so far as Larry was concerned Ron didn’t even own the damn Popeye work because he hadn’t paid for it duh not that Ron was having anything to do with that as an idea because he had copies of his cheques. It’s complicated.
You can read the whole amazing story here in the Huffington Post and in even more juicy detail here via Bloomberg.
Image: Jeff Kons's Granite Popeye (simulation only)
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: controversy, dealer gallery, koons, sculpture
Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Bathing beauty
Danu Sefton in the Dominion Post describing the police’s reaction and lack of interest when they came to her house to check on whether or not a photo she took of her daughter in the bath depicted child abuse
Posted by jim and Mary at 12:00 PM
Labels: photography, quote
Insect art: an overview
Having said that, we admit that we have had a bad run with insect art here at OTN. Yes, we did jump the gun on snail art and, as many OTN readers pointed out, our painting fly post left quite a bit to be desired, most particularly that the flies didn’t actually paint anything themselves but were part of a fly-artist combo that mostly relied on the artist for composition etc.
But with cockroach art we are on much firmer ground. OK someone has to load them up (with paint that is) and set them down on the paper but from there on it is pure cockroach-inspired creativity that you see on the page. So here are a couple of paintings as a taster. You can see more here and read about how one man has dedicated his life to allowing these disliked insects express themselves.
Posted by jim and Mary at 6:42 AM
Labels: not animal art
Tuesday, September 25, 2012
What’s in that crate?
Image taken at Art + Object at the day after the Paris Collection sale.
A+O tell us that for the full 10 points the answer is in fact Neil Dawson's sculpture Framework II made in 1988 giving it even better creds for being one of the last NAG crates.
Posted by jim and Mary at 12:00 PM
The curator’s egg
From the left, the education department is pushing hard on how to develop appropriate experiences for specific audiences and how those experiences should be framed via labels, audio tours and public programmes. Coming from the right, the design department has removed curators from any physical contact with the work they select and has made the presentation of work its own area of professional expertise. And of course from all directions comes the marketing department with opinions about everything and the conviction its audience research ensures it always knows best. The curators have also played a part in their own relegation thanks to the comparatively recent concept of curating a single artist's installation (as in ”I am curating artist X to do a solo installation in Venice.") when in fact on many occasions they are just along for the ride.
Then there is the elevation of the activity of choosing in the wider culture that has also played its part with people out there ‘curating meals’ in a restaurant, ‘curating the product in a store and ‘curating the news’ on TV. The old museum curatorial triumvirate of choose, present and preserve has been pretty much worn away with the 'choose' part just hanging on by a thread.
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: art education, curators, Te papa, venice biennale
Monday, September 24, 2012
Overheads
Posted by jim and Mary at 12:00 PM
Labels: art museum
Question time
You can see the difficulty for the Gallery when the jurors wouldn't play ball but as they were paid for their services it's hard to understand how the Gallery could just roll over on it. Who's betting the jury contract is being revised right now?
Given all this, what do you think could have been going through the Auckland Art Gallery’s head when it decided to incorporate the jury’s odd behaviour into its marketing plan? We kid you not. The tagline for the Walters Prize poster campaign is: “Can you judge it without seeing it?” It feels defensive but is probably meant to be provocative and street-smart.
Thanks to the Walters Prize jury’s no-go-no-see policy we all know how they’d answer the question.
But now with the AAG’s marketing department forcing the issue so publically it’s probably time for the Auckland Art Gallery to come clean and let everyone know where they stand on it.
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: auckland art gallery, Walters Prize
Saturday, September 22, 2012
Putting the mouse on the mat
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: art school, media
Friday, September 21, 2012
Googling on: this week, bees
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: Gifts, govett-brewster
Thursday, September 20, 2012
Leaving Paris
Posted by jim and Mary at 6:39 AM
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
The old cash or stash problem
Posted by jim and Mary at 12:00 PM
Labels: art museum, collecting, quote
Vanishing Wellington sub station
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: auction, private collector
Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Going, going, gone global
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: media, venice biennale
Monday, September 17, 2012
Die hard
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: collecting, collectors, mona
Sunday, September 16, 2012
Don Binney 1940-2012
Saturday, September 15, 2012
The Saturday chart
Best art movie
Who are these exhibitions for anyway?
No photography
Art and science
McCahon and tomorrow
What they sell at auction
Hierarchy of needs
A job at Te Papa
Exhibition time lines
Hirst
Touch 1
Modern art
Age will not weary them
Touch 2
Know what I like
Most loved art
The French and art
Barr's famous art chart
Power 100
Foot traffic
How dealers price paintings
Art market 2008-2009
Friday, September 14, 2012
Getting to the point
Touching
In memory of all this Duchamp history action here are some latter day tributes to Fountain. They range from a sticker you can use to convert your own toilet into a Duchampian gesture to a remote-controlled urinal signed R (the R was for Richard) Mutt.
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: controversy, copycat, duchamp, lookalike
Thursday, September 13, 2012
Dollars and sense
Posted by jim and Mary at 12:00 PM
Labels: advice to sculptors, public sculpture
… and change
Wednesday, September 12, 2012
Having a cow
Image: Warhol Cow wallpaper (detail)
Posted by jim and Mary at 12:00 PM
Labels: auction, dealers, private collector, warhol
Hearts and minds
You can read the four job descriptions Enterprises: here, Living culture: here, Operations: here and Future here.
Tuesday, September 11, 2012
A sign from Paris
Posted by jim and Mary at 11:00 AM
Labels: lookalike, thinking about
September 11
Monday, September 10, 2012
The waiting game
12 September: The Auckland Art Gallery has corrected our post on their collection of Walters Prize artists. In fact not all of the 13 Simon Denny's registered on their online catalogue were purchased by the Chartwell Collection. One of them, a photograph, was purchased by the gallery. Sorry about that.
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: auckland art gallery, chartwell, christchurch art gallery, collecting, Te papa, Walters Prize
Saturday, September 08, 2012
Lookalike
Friday, September 07, 2012
spam
Posted by jim and Mary at 7:00 AM
Labels: dealer gallery, ministry of culture, spam, Te papa, Walters Prize