Thanks H and you too M
Thursday, March 17, 2016
Fixtures and fittings
Thanks H and you too M
Posted by
jim and Mary
at
5:05 AM
Labels: architecture, mccahon, style (not)
Wednesday, March 16, 2016
Pics
Ian Macdonald’s The whale stranding at Muriwai Beach (72)
William Eggleston’s Untitled (Kentucky) (42)
Thomas Ruff’s Anderes Doppelportrait I (39)
Untitled 1974 by Glenn Busch (33)
Gavin Hipkins Untitled (44)
Ans Westra, Lunchtime Concert, Cuba Mall (19)
Frank Hofmann’s untitled photo of a woman blowing smoke (15)
Rhondda Bosworth’s Susy Suzie / another figure study (14)
Datura by Peter Peryer (10)
Marie Shannon’s Indoor Fireworks (7)
Another Frank Hofmann, Diving Tower, Prague (1)
And given that some of them might go under the high estimate, let’s also throw in American artist Mike Kelley’s intriguing Black out (Detroit River), Detail Panel 1 (41)
You can see the full catalogue here.
Image: Untitled (Kentucky) by William Eggleston
Posted by
jim and Mary
at
7:00 AM
Labels: auction, photography
Tuesday, March 15, 2016
Spam
Monday, March 14, 2016
Hammer horror
The fact is only two of the 117 works on offer have low estimates over $40,000. Even if you add up the high estimates on these two they'd only hammer down at $245,000. That wouldn’t have bought you a major work by Bill Hammond five years ago. It’s true that works over $100,000 are rarer than they were back then but 'Paramount' ? To have less than 12 percent of your high estimates over $20,000 and 88 percent below $10,000 is well, certainly rather challenging to the meaning of the word. Can Webb’s recapture its old ground under new management? Looking at this latest catalogue it’s going to be a long, hard slog.
Friday, March 11, 2016
Here comes the judge
Over the years the selection criteria for the Prize have changed a few times and this year quite radically. At the outset the Prize was for 'the most outstanding contribution made to contemporary art in New Zealand'. Later that shifted to ‘an outstanding work of contemporary New Zealand art produced and exhibited during the past two years’. This year it's ‘exceptional artworks that pushed the boundaries of art making in 2014 and 2015.’ No not you painters, sit down.
The elephant in the room is of course the director of the Auckland Art Gallery Rhana Devenport. Her relationship with one of the finalists is extremely close. In fact this is the second time a Reihana project curated by Devenport has been a finalist for the Walters Prize. In 2008 Devenport, as director of the Govett-Brewster Art Gallery, was on the panel that selected her Digital Marae for the 2008 Walters Prize. For the 2016 Prize, Devenport has not only curated and promoted a selected project, she has also been involved in the selection of the panel of four that chose it as a finalist and she will also be involved in selecting the judge who will make the final decision. No doubt many, many Chinese walls are being built within the AAG but there will be intense interest in how these obvious conflicts are going to be handled.
Past Walters Prizes have delighted with unexpected wins and left field choices but no mistake, the selection of the judge is a critical decision in the whole process. Anyone who listened to Charles Esche talk before the prize giving evening last time knew that Denny was dog tucker. As we've posted before, one reader claims to have picked most Walters Prize winners just by checking out the judge’s previous form. There will be much searching through the entrails when that announcement is made.
Posted by
jim and Mary
at
7:00 AM
Labels: auckland art gallery, denny, rhana devenport, Walters Prize
Thursday, March 10, 2016
On the QT and strictly hush hush
Over the past decade Creative NZ has professionalised. There have been some positive results (e.g. clearer accountability and priorities) but also some negative ones. Its processes are more complex for users, it's more risk averse, and it's become remarkably protective of any information it receives. Confidentiality agreements are used to control outsiders working with them and to side step what we would consider the intent of the Official Information Act.
This is not just a problem with Creative NZ, of course, it's endemic throughout the public service. Ask any journalist. We had our own experience of it when we asked who had applied for the Venice Biennale gig for 2015. We weren't asking for the discussions or the opinions or the minutes of the meeting, just who had applied. We took it to the Ombudsman but Creative NZ was way ahead of us. All outsiders involved had been tied up with confidentiality agreements from the outset so we got zip.
So you have to ask why anyone would to sign up to be a peer reviewer when they have to agree in writing:
• to keep confidential all information supplied by Creative New Zealand and any information relating to the assessment of an application (including assessment panel discussions) and to only use this information for the purpose of assessing an application. This means that applications cannot be discussed.
• to ensure that all such information is stored securely and that it will be accessible to no one but me for the sole purpose of assessment and that electronic material is deleted at the end of the decision making process and any hard copy material is returned to Creative New Zealand.
• not to discuss or write articles, including social media, on the assessment panel’s recommendations.
• not to report back to other organisations on the work of the assessment panel.
• To bite down hard on the green capsule provided should they be detained or questioned outside CNZ premises
As Agent J of The Men in Black said, 'Why the big secret? People are smart, they can handle it.'
Image: Secret Squirrel
Posted by
jim and Mary
at
7:00 AM
Labels: CNZ, cnz secrecy, cnz venice, secret squirrel
Wednesday, March 09, 2016
I robot
Images: Top, Roboschwartz. Middle left, Schwartz and right, Schwartz.01 and Bottom, left MiB farmer and right Otonaroid.
Tuesday, March 08, 2016
Crowd sourcing
(Thanks M, T and, a little later, D)
COMMENT VIA ANTHONY BYRT ON TWITTER : "I was so drunk I got Steve to write shortlist on my forehead so I wouldn't forget it. Magnificent speculation, this." OK Cross out Anthony
Posted by
jim and Mary
at
7:00 AM
Labels: Walters Prize
Monday, March 07, 2016
Twins
Images: left, Kleeware and right, Michael Parekowhai’s He Korero Purakau mo Te Awanui o Te Motu: story of a New Zealand river, both collection Te Papa Tongarewa. Thanks A
Posted by
jim and Mary
at
6:32 AM
Labels: parekowhai, Te papa, venice biennale
Friday, March 04, 2016
Sherrah Francis 1929-2016
By the early 1970s her three children Paul, Sarah and Emma were growing up and a few prints and paintings were turning into a major collection. Of the many highlights of this remarkable collection were Colin McCahon’s The canoe Tainui, possibly the first and certainly one of the greatest of Gordon Walters’ koru paintings Te Whiti, and Toss Woollaston’s portrait of Charles Brasch. They also became friends with the reserved Rita Angus purchasing a number of works.
If Tim was the quiet mind of consideration Sherrah often headed up the hunt. Naturally acquisitive and often alarmingly curious, she delighted in developing her own point of view and fiercely advocating for it. Her personal interest in early studio ceramics in New Zealand quickly focused on the work of women such as Olive Jones and Briar Gardner. Another passion perhaps sprang from her years at the Turnbull and her fascination with how early British settlers in New Zealand struggled to come to grips with this new landscape. What the resulting works often lacked in polish they certainly made up for in commitment and honesty giving the Francis collection an edge that made every visit to Tim and Sherrah pure pleasure.
Image: Sherrah and Tim Francis checking out a jewelry exhibition at the Dowse Art Museum
(Sherrah's funeral will be at 2pm on Thursday 10 March at St Peter's, Willis Street Wellington.)
Posted by
jim and Mary
at
10:46 AM
Connected
Image: Dougall Rolland and Chris Kraus in rehearsal for James K Baxter’s The temptations of Oedipus
Thursday, March 03, 2016
Time for a bit of a Lye down in New Plymouth
Best game in town has been watching the Govett-Brewster maneuvering its branding over the last month. After a year of Len Lye domination a recent media release subtly changed the tune by suggesting the new entrance is to a ‘combined art museum’. That’s one up for Monica’s gallery even if in reality it is pretty much a stairway to Len. The fact is the popularity of the shiny new Len Lye Centre has up to now rather skewed the hierarchy of the two institution but it looks like the pendulum is about to swing back towards the Govett-Brewster. The logo on the G-B’s new web site for instance has dropped the Len Lye Centre’s name and foregrounded the Saatchi & Saatchi rebrand of the Govett-Brewster as ‘Provocateurs’. We’ve also seen this fancy French word featured in G-B ads on the backs of buses so presumably we’re talking provocateurs as stirrers rather than criminal trouble-makers.
The up-coming 'all-galleries' exhibition of cameraless photography is also doing its bit to help push back on Len Lye’s domination of the Govett-Brewster. Taking up the entire building it will send the currently displayed Len Lye works packing and back into storage. This move has apparently annoyed some of New Plymouth’s politicians who see the Len Lye Centre as the destination magnet for the city rather than the G-B and who can blame them given the recent spectacular attendances.
The photography show Emanations is a big gamble for the Govett-Brewster and word is the show that has borrowed internationally has a huge budget. It's been suggested that nearly half a million has been invested in the exhibition although that hardly seems possible given the G-B’s total annual funding. Removing the Lyes to accommodate Emanations is certainly a bold move, given that the Len Lye Centre has been open less than a year. And while cameraless photography may not be what you might call provocative, it will certainly put the Govett-Brewster back in the picture.
Image: Govett-Brewster home page
Posted by
jim and Mary
at
7:00 AM
Wednesday, March 02, 2016
Underground art surfaces
Now, along with its offices, meeting rooms and foyers, Fletchers also had a rather more exciting space - a James Bond style gallery. It was in the form of a tunnel that went under the road to link two office blocks. Any staff members who scurried from one office across to the other also got to see a large selection of art works in rather spooky conditions. You could have passed by any number of paintings from something by Dick Frizzell to works by Gretchen Albrecht or Dan Arps. You can check out the complete Fletcher collection here. Sadly that unusual experience is now in the past. The tunnel has been closed with the doors at both ends locked shut. That could mean it’s more art to the block or maybe this time it will go into store or perhaps it will stay exactly where it is sealed like some kind of strange time capsule waiting for the future. You can read more about this unique arty tunnel here in the NZH.
Image: top, the eerie Fletcher tunnel and bottom, a work by Dan Arps seen along the way.
Posted by
jim and Mary
at
5:35 AM
Labels: auction, collections
Tuesday, March 01, 2016
Denny exhibition brings out the cloak and dagger in Te Papa
Denny's presentation at Venice put the Five Eyes spy network centre-stage reaching the dismal conclusion that the spy masters are just run of the mill corporate managers, albeit with chilling powers. So who's surprised that around 18 months ago, knowing that at least part of Denny's Secret Power was Te Papa bound, that someone hatched the bright idea to make a spy exhibition. The only reason we know this is thanks to the blog No right turn who used the Official Information Act to get documents out of Te Papa (you can read it here and also get access to the documents) outlining the show. The proposed timing is interesting too with Te Papa pushing for before Denny’s 2016 showing on their fifth floor. The original idea for the spy show actually came out of the Department of PM and Cabinet (Intelligence Coordination Group) working with Te Papa International Strategy Adviser. Hopefully not a standard source of exhibition ideas, but who was going to turn down a 'significant collection of scientific spying equipment, top secret documents, images (eg. political cartoons) and objects [to] tell the story of the secret world of NZ’s spies and their mission'?
As it turns out, Te Papa could. This proposal was in play months before the new CE Rick Ellis took over and it would be nice to think he was one to kick it into the gutter. Still, just think what might have been. This could have been an exhibition that overshadowed even Air New Zealand's brilliant PR capture of Te Papa. And lost too the opportunity to work with NZ’s top spies who were to 'provide the collection, expert advice, curatorial guidance (and co-curators); initiate and manage loans; manage political sensitivities etc’.
Presumably the crazy kids on the Te Papa staff (their names have been redacted from the documents) that dreamt up this wacky idea are still in the building pining over their lost opportunity to showcase the NZ intelligence community before Simon Denny sent them global. Secret Power indeed.
Posted by
jim and Mary
at
7:00 AM
Labels: curation (not), denny, Te papa















